This page was last updated:  09/21/06

smnewlogo.gif (15408 bytes)

Why Legalize Electronic Gambling Devices?

Proposed and Current Regulation Comparison

Key Points: 

Action to legalize stand-alone EGDs would have important benefits to the citizens of Indiana. It would recognize the reality that such activity already takes place in many venues across the state. It would bring it under regulatory control to ensure that the machines are operated appropriately and fairly, and assess taxes that would help to meet the current fiscal challenges of state and local governments. An EGD gaming tax can be an important source of revenue for the state, and the legislature should give it serious consideration. 

Legalization, taxation, and regulation of stand-alone electronic gaming devices (EGDs) present a new revenue source for the state as well as for local units of government, many of which are in financial straits similar to the state.

Adjusted gross revenues from EGD play at riverboat casinos in Indiana continue to show comfortable growth, despite ongoing competition from the existing, untaxed, stand-alone EGDs that have operated for many years in Indiana. (See Charts 1 and 2 on New Revenue Sources.)

The National Gambling Impact Study Commission (NGISC) reported in 1999 that legalized, stand-alone EGDs were in operation in six states.

The legislation proposed would:

Allow holders of permits for on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverages to operate EGDs on the licensed premises.

Establish an appropriate rate of taxation that ensures a positive revenue stream to the state.

Use existing state commission as the cognizant body to monitor compliance and enforcement of gaming laws and regulations for EGD operation.

Establish a maximum number of EGDs that may be operated on the premises of a license holder.

Prohibit EGDs play by minors.

Require that EGDs be out of sight of minors.

Require that off-site EGD operations be connected to a central communications system to ensure proper monitoring and to compute and bill taxes due.

Thousands of Hoosier businesses, most of them small and locally owned and operated, would benefit from the additional revenues that would be generated by stand-alone EGD gaming.

nue Source:
Legalized Electronic Gaming

Proposed and Current Regulation Comparison

Proposed: Reduce the number of illegal video gaming devices that are currently found in numerous gas stations, convenience stores, truck stops, Laundromats, delis, and even bait shops around the state. Legalization would limit the number of machines and the location. Current: Unregulated there is no limit on the number of machines any location can have and current enforcement by the Excise Police has only driven these machines underground.
Proposed: Restrict access to these devices to adults over the age of 21 in on-premise licensed beverage establishments like bars, taverns, social and fraternal organizations. Current: Unregulated devices are accessible to anyone, anywhere, anytime.
Proposed: Regulate payouts to a fair percentage established by the state. Current: Unregulated machines can be set at a low unfair percentage payout.
Proposed: Tax this type of machine that has been flourishing in the state for over 20 years. Current: Unregulated and illegal it is unlikely many pay any taxes on the revenues. Estimates show that the state may be losing 300 million dollars per year by not regulating these devices.
Proposed: Allow many small family-owned independent Hoosier businesses and non-profit clubs to legally profit from Indiana’s gaming industry to keep those dollars in the local community. Current: Only a few (mostly out of state) mega corporations now control and prosper from legalized gaming. Their taxes go to Indiana but the corporate profits go out of state.
Proposed: Allow counties to share a portion of the revenue to encourage local enforcement and to help local jurisdictions with an additional revenue stream. Current: Many local prosecutors do not prioritize video gaming cases for numerous reasons, but may have more reason to if Indiana would offer a legal form of this kind of gaming and include the county in the revenue sharing.
Proposed: Give some hard working people in the hospitality industry a break! Serving alcohol is one of the most highly regulated businesses. We are in one of the most taxed industries. Collectively we create possibly the most total revenue for the state through sale taxes and we are one of the states largest employers. Current: Year after year we are faced with more restrictions and higher taxes that continue to erode our bottom line and put the small independent bars, clubs, and fraternal organizations out of business. In the last few years we have seen .08 BAC, increased use of roadblocks, smoking bans, and local food & beverage taxes.
Proposed: Since individual locations will only have a few machines, the tax rate must be lower than at Indiana’s large casinos with a 1000+ machines. This lower tax rate would make it feasible for a small location to only have a few machines while Indiana would prosper by the total volume of machines. Current: Indiana sees little revenue from the numerous illegal gamming devices currently found around the state.

Return to Previous Page